Voting, Parents, and the Importance of Your
Candidate Winning Your State
Supplement
to this Feature
Compiled by
David Pakman
We surveyed 1050 Bush and Kerry
voters (no third party voters in this one) and asked them about their
voting preference, how they voted compared to their parents, and how
important it is to them to live in a state where the candidate they
voted for won. Some of the results were as I expected, while some were
the exact opposite. Here are the results:
Your Vote versus Your Parents' Vote
1. Kerry voters are more likely to vote the opposite party as their
parents:


At first glance, a 9% difference between Bush and Kerry voters may not
seem like much. However, it's important to consider that by default, it
is not equally likely that children would vote with or against their
parents' vote, but actually more reasonable that children vote the same
way as their parents. While 21% of Bush voters had parents who voted for
Kerry or typically voted Democratic, 30% of Kerry voters had parents who
voted for Bush or typically voted Republican. This is almost 50% more
Kerry voters than Bush voters casting a ballot the opposite direction as
their parents.
Maybe more interestingly is how it breaks down by age. Before starting
this research, I fully expected that the younger voters are, the more
likely they are to vote the other way as their parents. However, I
couldn't have been more wrong in that pre-survey hypothesis.
2. Older voters are more likely to vote the
opposite way as their parents than younger voters:

25% of voters ages 18-44 voted the opposite way as their parents,
compared to 33% of voters ages 44 and up. In other words, older voters
vote against their parents' traditional political orientation by a rate
33% higher than younger voters. What is interesting is that in the
survey, age was broken down into six age brackets. The youngest
three all had just about 25% voting against their parents, while all
three of the older brackets were at just about 33%, so these numbers
represent not only the mean, but the mode of the data as well.
Importance of Living in a State Your Candidate Won
1. Kerry voters find it more important to
live in a state where the candidate they voted for won compared to Bush
voters:


When given the four options listed, Kerry voters indicated by almost a
66% higher rate than Bush voters that living in a state their candidate
wins is "very important." Even more interesting is when it is broken
down into just two options, "more" or "less" important:


While Bush voters specified more-to-less important by a 3-to-2 ratio,
Kerry voters said that by a 4-to-1 ratio, living in a state where their
candidate won is more important. Lastly, the importance of who wins your
state compared to age.
2. Older voters find it more important to
live in a state their candidate wins than younger voters:

The trend clearly indicates that the older the voter, the more likely to
indicate "very important," and accordingly, less likely to indicate "not
at all important." As of yet, I have no theories about why this may be.
Please send any questions, comments,
or hate mail about this feature to me
here. |